There’s a natural
tendency among Americans to think that democracy works.
We were all brought
up to believe that democracy best represents the will of the people.
It would, if
everybody participated. But not
everybody does, so democracy here often reflects the will of a much smaller
slice of the public – those motivated enough to be politically involved.
However, even if
everyone participated, the will of the people isn’t infallible. Our founders knew this. That’s why they attempted to engineer a
balance of power in our government.
The popularly
elected Representatives reflected the will of the people. Senators were selected by state legislatures
to represent the interests of the states.
(This changed with the populist-inspired 17th
Amendment in 1913 which permitted direct election of Senators by popular vote.)
The President was
elected not by the majority of the popular vote – which would be mob rule – but
by an Electoral College. This neat
invention helped to ensure that every state would have a representative voice
in the selection of a President; lesser known is that it also served as a last-ditch
safety valve.
Finally, the
Supreme Court was created to be above all of this, with lifetime appointments
for its members. Its power was to
interpret whether laws and regulations created by popularly-elected politicians
conflicted with the Constitution of the United States. So the Supreme Court
could invalidate and/or temper bad laws that, while popular, were unconstitutional.
These were all attempts
to minimize the impact of mob rule, and the tyranny of a majority empowered to
take away the rights of the minority. The
founders deliberately tried to water down “pure” democracy so that the changing
whims of a fickle and potentially self-serving public didn’t run roughshod over
the intrinsic rights of others.
They recognized,
intuitively, that the public couldn’t always be counted on to do the right
thing. Lest we forget, slavery at one
time had popular support in America, as did Prohibition, and laws against
miscegenation. Segregation didn’t end by
popular vote.
Nor could a
popularly-elected Congress or President always be trusted to do the right
thing.
That why there’s a
Constitution and a Bill of Rights.
Curiously, the Bill of Rights is almost exclusively about limiting what
government can do. In the eyes of the
Anti-Federalists of the time, the Constitution gave too much power to a
popularly-elected central government; the Bill of Rights tilted it back toward
preserving individual and states’ rights.
That’s enough of a
history lesson. The important thing to
remember is that these were all carefully considered ideas designed to make us
a nation of laws, not whims. Most of
all, everything was consciously engineered to hinder mob rule and especially to
prevent anyone from gaining the powers of an absolute monarch.
So where are we
now?
Despite the best
efforts of the founders, we are increasingly moving toward mob rule. And many would say that we already have a de
facto monarchy.
How did this
happen?
Well, an efficient
and enduring democracy requires an informed and rational electorate.
Candidly, the
public is not that well informed. Nor
does the general public care to be; it’s too much work. Also, politicians and the media have
exacerbated the problem by dumbing down everything to a good vs. evil, black or
white equation. They’re not interested
in educating the public; they realize that’s like trying to teach a pig to sing
– it would waste their time and annoy the pig.
So they take the
path of least resistance. They turn
important issues into bite-size, more digestible morality plays; political soap
operas where there are clearly defined heroes and villains. Heroes are above reproach; villains are beneath
contempt. There are no gray areas – only
black and white. By design.
Everybody talks
about “low information voters.” Truth
is, most voters today fall into that category.
They might as well be getting their information from cartoons. Roadrunner and Wile E. Coyote seem to be the
media’s model for political coverage, along with Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd.
It’s easy to see
who to root for. One side’s clever; the
other’s clueless. That’s
intentional.
In reality,
virtually none of today’s problems have simple solutions, no matter how clever one side or the other may be.
The voting public generally
doesn’t even understand the true nature and scope of the problems we face. They don’t understand basic economics, much
less domestic and global economics. They
don’t understand the debt ceiling, why inner city schools are failing, why
gasoline costs what it does, or why food prices go up or down. They’ve
been conditioned to believe that somebody smarter than them has already figured
this stuff out. So they don’t need to
worry about it anymore. It’s
handled.
Politicians and the
media know the public doesn’t want to be bothered with the details. So they
tell the public what they want to hear, the facts be damned. It suits politicians’ purposes better. Because while an efficient and enduring
democracy requires an informed and rational electorate, a mob doesn’t.
Make no mistake, politicians prefer a mob. A
mob is easier to inflame, manipulate and wield against opponents. It can be used to intimidate adversaries
because of its inherent volatility; it doesn’t take much to push a mob from
protest to violence. Most of all, it
doesn’t care about facts; it only cares about what it feels is true. In the hands of a demagogue it’s a powerful
tool.
It also gets media
coverage, which makes a mob seem even bigger and important.
Even the most
brain-dead in Congress and the Administration know they can’t sway public
opinion with facts and logic. Much less
get re-elected. The public won’t stand
for it; they want simple answers, simple solutions and someone to cheer and someone
to boo. They’re fans moved by passion
and emotion, not reason and knowledge.
Mob rule is taking
over American politics. It’s a demagogue’s
dream come true.
We’re seeing that
now as the President and his administration are trying to overturn the balance
of power in the government. What he’s
been unable to get through as legislation, he’s pushed through as regulations. He’s bypassed the legislative process with
Executive Orders. He’s refused to
execute the laws of the United States, as required by his oath of office,
including laws he helped to create. He’s
tried to intimidate the Supreme Court.
His Administration has used the power of government agencies to punish
his political adversaries and help his supporters. And like a true demagogue, he’s demonized any
opponents to his power grabs.
In any other
universe, these would be grounds for impeachment. But Obama’s got a mob at his back. In today's political environment, that matters.
He’s built a base
of voters largely dependent on a perpetuation of liberal Democrat policies for
practically everything. He’s managed to
nearly double dependency on food stamps – even over the dramatic increases
during the Bush Administration – and will soon have control over who gets
healthcare, for how much, and for how long.
He’s convinced his base that he can single-handedly restore the economy, reduce foreclosures,
reduce student loan debt, and soak the rich to pay for everything, if only he
had unbridled authority to do whatever he wants.
Instead of being
alarmed at his near dictatorial attitude, his fans think he’s great. That’s because he gives them whatever they
want. He exploits their prejudices
against anyone who has been more successful in life than they have. And he tells them that every problem they
face is caused by someone else, not them. His supporters are absolved of any personal responsibility. All their problems are the fault of greedy bankers and Wall Street, right-wing
fanatics, soulless corporations, and others Hell-bent on keeping them poor,
sick, and in debt.
Only he – and his government
– stand between his followers and the abyss. With the stakes so high, he can’t
be expected to be held to rules written by a bunch of dead white guys a couple of hundred
years ago.
This is music to the
ears of his supporters. They only wish
he’d do more. They wish his power were
more absolute. They wish he didn’t have
to deal with Congress or the Supreme Court at all. In fact, they wish he could be President for
Life.
How scary is that?
That’s what happens
when a mob becomes the apparent majority, primarily because they're the only ones motivated enough to vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment