Trump is reported to have called some places in the world "shitholes" in closed-door discussions on immigration.
This created an another opportunity for manufactured outrage. Now, like naughty little boys and girls, the media can’t get
enough of saying shit in one form or another.
Shitholes. Shitstorms. Whatever.
Did Trump say shitholes, or didn’t he? Did he use it to
describe mostly African countries? And Haiti? And other places of non-whites?
Is it proof that he’s (gasp) a racist?
Hey folks. Get a grip.
I’m pretty sure most of us know he said shitholes. Seriously,
we all know that.
Now you can draw whatever conclusions you want about whether
it was culturally insensitive, politically incorrect, or something else. It
probably was. But the truth of the matter is we don’t need more immigrants from
shithole countries. Or Haitians.
It’s true as well there are a lot of shithole countries out
there. They’re not all in Africa.
Ever been to Jamaica?
Get outside the heavily guarded resorts and it’s a shithole. Sorry, mon, but it is. So is much of Mexico,
again once you leave the resorts. When you see large numbers of people living
in shacks with hammered soda cans for a roof, and toting water for drinking in
recycled gas cans, that’s a shithole. I’ve seen all that firsthand in Jamaica,
in Mexico, in Belize, and elsewhere.
Soldiers back from Iraq and Afghanistan will tell you those places
are shitholes, too.
I can’t speak for Africa. However, I strongly suspect there
are many shithole countries there.
Any
country where most people are illiterate, have no access to clean water, much
less toilets, or education, where pre-teen females are traded for goats, and
where it’s an accepted belief that men can cure AIDs by having sex with a
virgin, is likely a shithole.
I could be
wrong, but I doubt it.
Parts of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are quite literally
shitholes; ask anyone who has been to these. When people are crapping in the streets,
that’s a shithole by definition
Many countries in Central and South America qualify
as shitholes as well. After you get past
the guards at your resort or cruise terminal, see how people in the countryside
live. It’s typically in abject poverty under the constant threat of abuse by
the police or army or criminal gangs.
I don’t blame the people who live in these shitholes. They
don’t have much choice.
And it’s no wonder they’d want to be someplace else. Like
here.
Unfortunately, we can’t take them all. The Pope can say all
he wants about our duty as Christians to welcome these people to our country
but we have our own people to care for.
I’m sorry for the plight of the displaced Syrians, the Somalis, the Guatemalans,
the El Salvadorians, the Mexicans, the Nigerians, the Sierra Leoneans, the
Congolese, Haitians, and everyone else struggling to survive where they are and
holding out hope for a better life here or in Europe.
The harsh reality is we don’t need them.
We need immigrants, for sure, if for no other reason than
our aging workforce and low birth rates among our legal citizens. We’re in a looming demographic crisis, not as
bad as Japan and many European countries, but in time just as serious.
No one doubts that.
The real issue is which immigrants. We don’t simply need more warm bodies to feed
and support; we already have quite enough of those. We don’t need more
illiterate immigrants with no discernable job skills applicable to our changing
economy either. And we certainly don’t need to import people who hate our way
of life, our culture, and have no intention of respecting our laws.
Do they have to be white? Of course not. Nor do they have to be Christians. They just
need to have skills and functional mastery of English to contribute meaningfully to our country over
time. The key is not skin color or
religion, or even country of origin, but attitude, desire to be a part of
America, and the ability to bring something we need.
Immigrating to America is a privilege, not a universal right.
It must be earned by meeting objective standards for admission.
As cold as this sounds, there are plenty of other desirable
people in the world – people with education and valuable skills – who want to
come here and become citizens; we can afford to pick and choose who we want. We
don’t have to open the floodgates and allow everybody in regardless of their
ability to contribute, or allow those here illegally to stay, just because the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce or large agribusinesses want a perpetual source of
cheap labor. Or because some politicians want that.
It doesn’t mean we should only accept rich people with PhDs
in quantum physics. However, we should require certain thresholds be met, much
as Canada does. (Far from a wide-open
immigration free-for-all see
https://www.canadavisa.com/canadian-immigration-requirements.html
for reference.) We need to have a merit-based system in place, like Canada.
Now, in fairness, I don’t care if someone comes from a
shithole country, or anyplace else for that matter, as long as they meet
certain criteria.
Simply having a pulse and the ability to fog a mirror isn’t
enough. Or the desire to escape the crappy place where you now live. Frankly, if
you are poor, have no education or skills except to reproduce, and have no ability
to support yourself or your family without government assistance, we’re already
full up on people like you. We don’t need more.
And as far as increasing our “diversity,” that’s also a
non-starter. Importing people who have nothing to offer just because they are
from an obscure place that culturally and educationally might as well be
another planet doesn’t make sense. For a
zoo, maybe; not for a country.
You have to bring something valuable to us to get in. That’s
what Trump is after. I suspect most American citizens would agree with that as
well.
No random drawing or quota system can insure that.
And yes, there are shithole countries.
We don’t need to discriminate against them; nor do we need
to favor them. We certainly don’t need to make sure we get a certain percentage
of our immigrants from them.
Especially if they have nothing of value to
offer us.
No comments:
Post a Comment