Intro

It's time for a reality check ...

Maybe we’ve reached the point of diminishing astonishment.

But I suspect that much of what we’re hammered with every day really doesn’t make much of an impact on most of us anymore. We’ve heard the same stories too often. We’ve been exposed to the same issues for so long without any meaningful resolution. We recognize that reality is rapidly becoming malleable, primarily in the hands of whoever has the biggest microphone. How else can we explain a society where myth asserts itself as reality, based entirely how many hits it gets online?

We know that many of the “issues” as defined are pure crapola, hyped by politicians on both sides pandering to “the will of the people,” which is still more crapola. Inevitably, it’s not the will of all the people they reflect, but the will of relatively small groups of people with disproportionate political influence.

Nobody wants to face up to the realities of the issues. Nobody wants to say what’s right or wrong – even when it’s obvious and there are numbers to back it up. Most of us are afraid to bring up the realities for fear of being accused of being insensitive or downright mean.

So we say nothing. Until now.

It’s time for a reality check on the fundamentals – much of which is common knowledge to many of us, already. But it might be comforting to know you are not alone …

Friday, October 14, 2016

How Trump can still win …

Trump really can’t trust anyone at this point.  So if he tries this he needs to keep this to himself and do this as a complete surprise to everyone – his family, his campaign people, and even Mike Pence.  He needs to bring this out when there’s virtually no time for anyone to plan a response. 

I’d suggest in the opening minutes of the next debate. 

He simply needs to say:

“If I am elected, I pledge to not serve for more than one term.”

This would be devastating to the Clinton campaign It would catch them completely off guard. Hillary isn’t good on her feet without a lot of prep – and sometimes, apparently, even the questions in advance – so she’d be stuck. It would change the whole dynamics not just of the debate, but of the race.   

What could she say? This is just a stunt from a failing candidate with no chance of winning anyway?  That would come off as more of her arrogance. She could say her campaign is all about preventing him from getting even that one term – which then only adds weight to doubts people have that Hillary actually stands for anything except grasping for power and money.

Then Trump should double down:

“Furthermore, I challenge Hillary to make the same pledge.  Let’s face it … we’re both in our 70s and the country needs younger leaders willing, and able, to move us forward.”     

Hillary would be completely dumbstruck. Trump would be playing the age and health card on both of them.  I don't know how she could respond.  Would she even try to make a case that she's full of fresh new ideas and physically up to the job?  Que the TCU on her and that fails.  

Meanwhile, the media would go completely nuts – this has never been done before by any major party candidate for President. 

The media have about run the sex tape thing into the ground and this would give them a new angle. Since both candidates are deeply unpopular, and the media know the public wants change, this would add high drama plus another historic first – the first time someone running for President has willingly closed his or her options for a second term. That’s got a wow factor.

It would probably bring out the millennials for Trump as well – they want a fresh face in office; neither of these are, but now one of them will open the door for someone who probably will be younger and more in tune with their attitudes.   

Trump’s base – as well as proponents of term limits – would get on board.  Independents and others who want to send a message to the political establishment would probably love this – they could stick it to the Washington elites and know Trump’s only in a relatively short time before they get a do-over. And another perhaps more responsible bite at the apple.

Wavering Republicans would have the opportunity to support Trump and Pence now, with the probability they’ll get Pence – who would gain four years of executive office experience – when Trump’s four years are up. And they much prefer Pence.

I know it’s a hail-Mary pass.  But I think it would work. 

After all, as Trump himself has said: What the Hell do you have to lose? 

No comments:

Post a Comment