It was recently announced that the Justice Department is
looking into bringing charges against companies that deny climate change. Specifically, it’s targeting major energy
companies for claiming that burning fossil fuels may not be that important a
factor in climate change.
Justice is drawing parallels to when tobacco companies were
held to have misled the public about the dangers of smoking for years, causing
countless deaths. The judgements against those companies resulted in
multi-billion-dollar settlements. Justice is now saying the major energy
companies are also misleading the public putting lives at risk.
What’s really going on here is that the Obama Administration
wants to use the threat of Justice Department actions to intimidate those it
calls “climate change deniers” from expressing their views. Right now, it’s
focused on energy companies; however that won’t stop the climate-change crowd
from going after anyone else who dares question the somewhat specious science surrounding
the whole issue of climate change.
Attempts to suppress speech isn't just a passing fad. Anytime someone feels -- or thinks they might feel -- offended, it's not uncommon to see politicians move to abridge freedom of speech. The other day, after a typically raucous public hearing Philadelphia, some
City Council person introduced proposed regulations to limit what people could
say in public hearings. They were specifically targeting epithets and hurtful
language.
The question is always who decides what's hurtful? And who the Hell are they to decide?
We’re all aware of what’s been going on with the thought and
speech police on college campuses. We’ve heard about the “speech codes” and “safe
spaces.” We’re already getting pummeled for calling people here illegally
illegal aliens, which is precisely what they are. Our own President can’t describe terrorists
following an extreme form of Islam Islamic terrorists. Our President and State Department can’t
bring themselves to say that it’s genocide when Islamic fanatics specifically
target and massacre Christians and others deemed infidels.
Political correctness is out of control and getting worse.
Every few days there’s another article about some supposed affront to one group
or another.
The remedy is sensitivity or diversity training classes –
which are exactly what? Recognizing that there are people of different races,
ethnicities and religions here? That there are people of different genders
here? That not everybody is
heterosexual? That some people might
find a particular joke in bad taste? That you shouldn’t grope a person who
doesn’t want to be groped?
Holy crap. Everybody
with the good sense God gave a sweet potato knows all that already. So what’s
the point? The point is simply to intimidate
people into the political correctness standards du jour. It’s also purely subjective. Protected groups
can do or say whatever they wish; anyone not part of those protected groups can’t
– they have to be “sensitive” to the feelings of those others. Their feelings trump everybody else's rights.
This nonsense even gets the official imprimatur of the government.
In April 2015 the U.S. Army made 400 soldiers at one base sit through a presentation
on how American society “attaches privilege to being white and male and
heterosexual.” All in the guise of
diversity training. To what purpose? Probably
just to remind our soldiers they’re defending an increasingly whiney and
hypersensitive country that worries more about feelings than its soldiers' lives.
If anyone wonders why Donald Trump has such appeal, this is a
big part of the answer.
His critics accuse him of being crude, offensive and insensitive.
That he is; it’s also why his supporters
love him. He blurts out stuff that makes people cringe at times mainly because
they’ve been conditioned to cringe at politically incorrect statements.
Sure, a lot of it is over the top – like saying Mexico sends
us their rapists and murderers – however people recognize that in his bluster
there’s often a grain of truth. The Mexican government may not be consciously
sending their murderers and rapists here, but it’s sure as Hell not doing
anything to stop them. Not every illegal
here from Mexico is a murderer or rapist, either, but more than one is too many
to anyone they murder or rape.
He calls illegals what they are – illegals. He wants to build a wall to close our southern
border and deport illegals – a view held by many Americans. He calls our current
political leaders stupid and incompetent – and it’s not too hard to see some
truth in that. He calls many of our trade
agreements a disaster – again, he’s got some valid points there. He blames
Obama and Kerry for a terrible deal with Iran over nukes – that’s what most
people think. He also blames Obama for weakening the American military and
making our allies doubt whether we can be trusted – can’t argue with that
either.
Does that alone make him a great candidate for
President? Probably not. But a substantial slice of the voters –
Republicans, Independents, and conservative Democrats – are supporting him. Many
of my professional and college-educated friends quietly do as well, so he’s not
just getting the lower income, less-educated base his opponents claim he’s
pandering to.
His support is broad and increasingly deep. He’s tapped into
the mood of many Americans who feel the pendulum has swung too far and that the country is headed in a
direction they are more uncomfortable with all the time.
They want to bring things back to an America they can
understand again. They’ve had it with the thought and speech police, and walking
on eggs so they won’t offend anyone. They’re fed up with nuanced positions and dithering
politicians too timid to tell the truth.
Right now they are voting for Trump because they feel he’s
the only one with the balls to really shake things up. He’s the worst nightmare for the thought and
speech police and progressive ideals of not just the Democrats, but the
establishment Republicans as well.
And they love him for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment