It always wise to make sure that the battle you’ve chosen is
worth it.
This seems to be lost on race-baiters like Sharpton, Marc
Lamont Hill, and Eric Holder. They’ve
all embraced the circumstances surrounding Michael Brown’s death – as they did
Trayvon Martin’s – as emblematic of continuing racism in America’s justice
system. They’ve waved the bloody shirt to other activists to signal that it’s
okay to riot, loot, burn, and destroy in protest when they don’t agree with the
results of court decisions. They’re also using these cases to support their
narrative that young black males are disproportionally targeted by law
enforcement simply for being black.
This is a mistake; it’s likely to be a costly one. It’s the
wrong battle, at the wrong time, based on the wrong circumstances, for all the
wrong reasons. There’s little to be gained when the facts, the law, and the
circumstances are not on your side.
Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown are not Emmett Till. They are not the four young girls killed in
the Baptist Church bombing in Birmingham. They are not Medgar Evers or Dr. King.
If you want to draw parallels to the civil rights movement,
these aren’t your guys.
Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown were not innocents slain by racists. They were both gangsta wannabes; self-styled “tough
guys” with a history of petty crimes and violence against others. They took selfies holding guns and wads of
money. They didn’t die simply because they were young black males, but because they
stupidly attacked someone who had a gun.
It was only news because they were shot by someone who
wasn’t black.
Had Michael Brown – or Trayvon Martin –
been fatally shot by a black cop, or another black male, there would be no
story. He would just be added to the statistics that already show that the overwhelming
majority of young black males who are murdered are killed by other black males.
And murder remains the top cause of death for young black
males.
Moreover, Brown’s death was not a “tragedy.” He was a
criminal and a bully – captured on video committing a strong-arm robbery 10
minutes before he got shot by the cop he attacked. The real tragedy was the destruction
of Ferguson businesses and public property by those who used the death of this
punk as an excuse to loot, burn and create havoc.
His parents, step-parents, and other family members can wail
on TV all they like about what a “good” kid he was, and how their “child” did
nothing that warranted him being “gunned down in cold blood,” or “murdered” by
the police. Sobbing, tearful family
members make good TV, as does the staged clip of a mother collapsing in grief
into the arms of friends.
But it’s all for show; parents of thugs like Michael Brown
aren’t terribly surprised when their kid gets killed. However, they rarely
expect that to happen as a result of a confrontation with police, because, well, it almost never happens.
Between 2010 and 2012 black teens 15-19 were killed by
police at a rate of 31.17 per million. Death by homicide among black males in the
same age group averages 48.8 per 100,000. Large numbers of black kids dying at the hands
of cops of any color is pure mythology.
That’s the inconvenient truth. Here’s more …
If you’re a young black male, your probability of being a
homicide victim is almost 17 times greater than a white male the same age. (Homicide rates for young white males are
about 2.9 per 100,000.) And since for
the most part homicides are overwhelmingly between people of the same race, most
likely you’ll be killed by another black male.
Now, critics claim the reason for this has more to do with
poverty and proximity than anything else.
Poverty breeds crime, they say, and more blacks live in crime-ridden
areas. Since most homicides regardless
of race happen between people who know each other and live near to each other,
there’s some merit to this argument.
But it doesn’t explain why so many in the black community –
including race baiters like Sharpton and Hill – turn a blind eye to black on
black murder rates, or dismiss these as media distortions. Apparently a black
kid killing another black kid is no big deal; but in the extremely rare event
that someone who isn’t black kills a black kid, then society doesn’t value
black lives.
No one wants to admit that a growing thug culture embraced
and emulated by a lot of young blacks – and some young whites – glorifies
violence against others in general and the police in particular. That doesn’t
mean it’s a direct line from movies and music to murder, as some suggest. Still,
if artists you idolize say that killing or being killed is the path to fame and
respect, and right now you feel you have neither, then it’s going to have an
effect.
Black on black murder in some areas is so common that a
thriving business is making and selling “RIP” t-shirts with screen-printed pictures
of the deceased, often in gangsta gear while holding guns and flashing gang
signs. Sadder still is that some black kids collect these like baseball cards, building
a wardrobe that brings a whole new
meaning to “fashion to die for.”
Michael Brown, like Trayvon before him, was a product of this
culture. He was far from a gentle giant
who, as one family member said, “wouldn’t hurt nobody.” The video clip of his
robbery demonstrates otherwise. A recent
picture posted online shows him with a gun and a wad of money. So the media can display all the choir-boy
images of him they like but it won’t change who and what he was. He was
destined to have his face screen-printed on a t-shirt. It was only a matter of
time.
I am sorry, but I can’t find it in me to have a single iota
of sympathy for Trayvon, Michael, or their families. To me, Trayvon and Michael
were self-absorbed punks, raised by self-absorbed mothers, fathers and step
parents who failed in their duties to civilize their offspring. Now, after the
fact, they all want to blame someone or something else – the police, the
justice system, society, racism, whatever – for the monsters they produced
through their own neglect and indifference.
Am I sorry they died? I suppose – but mainly in a
philosophical way. Trust me, when the
verdicts were announced, I neither wept nor celebrated. Based on what I did know from digging beyond
the breathless headlines and talking heads, justice was served.
What happened to Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin is not
evidence of a racially biased justice system, but the opposite – the system
worked the way it should, based on evidence instead of emotion. Nor are they
martyrs for civil rights; neither of them gave a damn about anything but
themselves.
Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin are the wrong ponies to
ride into battle. And this is the wrong
battle to fight at the wrong time.
The images of rioting and looting in Ferguson, the destruction
of black-owned businesses there and Brown’s step father on video telling
everyone to “burn this bitch down” are still fresh in everyone’s minds. So is the media coverage of other acts of
violence and mayhem in various cities. Add
the fact that “hands up, don’t shoot” never happened according to testimony
from witnesses in the grand jury hearings. And don’t forget the outing of
Officer Wilson’s home address and marriage license, and the subsequent threats
on his and his pregnant wife’s lives.
Overall, the Michael Brown case is not likely to sustain sympathy
for very long. When more of the facts come out he’ll be just another punk, not
a folk hero.
Linking it to the Trayvon Martin debacle does nothing to
change that. That will remind most of us
of how the media shamelessly manipulated its coverage to support a false
narrative about an innocent young man executed by a white vigilante for the
crime of being black and wearing a hoodie. The media manipulation of the Brown
case will be seen as more of the same.
There are only so many times you can play the race card
before it starts losing its potency. When you play it all the time, even when
it’s not applicable, you decrease its value even faster.
And this is one of those times.
The shooting of Michael Brown – like that of Trayvon Martin –
had nothing to do with race. The acquittal of Zimmerman, and the decision not
to indict Wilson had nothing to do with race, either. Falsely claiming both did
may play well in the black community, but that’s only about 13% of the
population. Add the big-city liberals and NPR crowd and you add maybe another 20%
The rest of the country isn’t buying it. Been there, done
that. Won’t get fooled again.
Between inflammatory statements by Michele and Barack Obama
over the years, and the perpetual animus of Holder, Sharpton, and others who see
racism in everything, race relations in this country have already been set back
by decades.
Choosing to rally around the Brown and Martin events to focus
America on the need to address distrust among minorities of police and the
justice system is a poor decision. Especially
now.
A better battle would be to address how to prevent crime in
minority communities.
That would make more sense than focusing on what happens after a crime is committed.
No comments:
Post a Comment