Intro

It's time for a reality check ...

Maybe we’ve reached the point of diminishing astonishment.

But I suspect that much of what we’re hammered with every day really doesn’t make much of an impact on most of us anymore. We’ve heard the same stories too often. We’ve been exposed to the same issues for so long without any meaningful resolution. We recognize that reality is rapidly becoming malleable, primarily in the hands of whoever has the biggest microphone. How else can we explain a society where myth asserts itself as reality, based entirely how many hits it gets online?

We know that many of the “issues” as defined are pure crapola, hyped by politicians on both sides pandering to “the will of the people,” which is still more crapola. Inevitably, it’s not the will of all the people they reflect, but the will of relatively small groups of people with disproportionate political influence.

Nobody wants to face up to the realities of the issues. Nobody wants to say what’s right or wrong – even when it’s obvious and there are numbers to back it up. Most of us are afraid to bring up the realities for fear of being accused of being insensitive or downright mean.

So we say nothing. Until now.

It’s time for a reality check on the fundamentals – much of which is common knowledge to many of us, already. But it might be comforting to know you are not alone …

Thursday, September 20, 2012


The problem is not taxes, it’s spending

A lot is made about the 47% who don’t pay Federal income taxes.  About how the rich should pay more – their “fair share.” And how our tax rates are too low to support our government. 

Lost in all this barrage of claims and counter claims is one overlooked reality. 

We’re not going broke because taxes aren’t high enough. 

We’re going broke because we’re spending too much.    

Nobody wants to address that.  The presumption – particularly by the media and the Democrats – is that what the government needs is not open to discussion. 

Which is why you hear the media and Democrats constantly hammer at the need to raise taxes on someone or something to provide more money to the government.    

They never bring up that maybe – just maybe – we should look at the other side of the equation. 

Maybe government doesn’t actually “need” as much money. 

Maybe government could cut spending so they didn’t need as much money.  Or have to borrow so much from the Chinese. 

Maybe government – and politicians – could get in touch with reality, first.  Maybe they should consider what we actually need as opposed to what politicians and special interests want.

If they honestly grasped that, maybe we wouldn’t be wasting money on building an international airport in Johnstown, Pennsylvania.  Or financing a road to nowhere in Alaska.  Funding a golf course somewhere, teaching inner-city kids to play tennis, building bike paths in urban areas, or financing a high-speed railroad to connect California to Nevada,

Or forcing the military to buy stuff they don’t want or need.   

None of these things are really needed.  But we spend a lot of money on them.   

And maybe, if they knew we were paying more attention, they wouldn’t use our dollars to pay for a media campaign to encourage illegal immigrants to sign up for food stamps.   Or to fund advertising to seniors to promote the benefits of ObamaCare.
   
Sure these may all be nice ideas – to somebody – but should government be paying for them?

The American public can’t seem to get the point across to elected officials and bureaucrats that we can’t afford to squander money on “nice” ideas.  We have to focus on necessities.   

The harsh reality – and why we apparently can’t get out of our current fiscal mess – is that as soon as politicians get their hands on new money, or even the promise of new money, they immediately spend it.  Give them more money through higher taxes, and poof, it’s gone. 

And almost always on other things that have nothing to do with what they got the money for.  

Remember when Social Security taxes were raised a few years ago to “save” the program for seniors?   Do you know where that money – and the money before it – actually went? 

Now some people do know that the government has been looting Social Security funds for years for all kinds of purposes. And then replacing what they take with government IOUs.  It’s perhaps the worst-kept secret in D.C.  And both parties have done it. 

But most people – except for those who run the programs – don’t know that for decades Social Security has been paying for pre-school education programs and a whole range of other things that have absolutely nothing to do with assuring financial security for seniors.  You’d be amazed at everything your Social Security taxes pay for – and astonished how little of your money goes toward its long-term solvency.  Go ahead, look it up. 

It’s not just the Feds and Congress.  The tobacco settlement, which brought billions into state coffers to help offset health costs of smokers and to promote anti-smoking campaigns, was instead dumped into most states’ general funds.  The states then immediately spent almost all that money on everything from reducing state debt to raises for government employees.   

That’s why it’s maddening to hear the constant harping about the need for more money for the government – be it state or Federal.  Most of what they get they’ll squander. 

We all know this.  We see it every day.  

Which is why many of us are inherently opposed to higher taxes.  

It’s not because we are selfish and piggish, which is what the media wants you to believe.

Honestly, most Americans don’t mind paying taxes – what they do mind is how frivolously and wastefully our tax dollars are used.   

The unspoken reason why many of us oppose higher taxes and are in favor of tax cuts is not that we simply want more money for ourselves. 

It’s because we want to starve the government.  We want it to learn to do what it needs to do with less.  We know it’s possible.  Government is desperately in need of an “intervention.”  We need to force the issue, address the government’s addiction to spending, and this is one way we think government will finally understand. 

I don’t understand why so many people are so hesitant to admit this. 

Government will never control spending until we cut up their credit cards and force them to balance spending and income.       

But until they recognize that the problem is spending, not solely income through taxes, the problem cannot be solved. 

No comments:

Post a Comment