I wish the Democrats could keep the impeachment hearings
going.
I know that’s selfish on my part.
But I just love seeing Democrats continue to expose how
silly this entire process is. The more they are on, the worse they come
off. Between the inane and irrelevant
comments from bozos like Swalwell, Sheldon Whitehouse, Shirley Jackson Lee, that
other pipsqueak from Rhode Island, and “what size pants do you wear in the
neck” Nadler, there’s been a lot of high comedy.
Mostly from the fake outrage from Democrats over stuff that
isn’t actually a crime.
You got to love it when a mental midget like “Ken doll” Swalwell
pretends to be a Constitution expert and argues that you don’t need a crime as
the basis for impeachment. He thinks “abuse of power” was also what the framers
intended although they didn’t specifically say that.
This might surprise some of the framers who set the standard
for impeachment as committing high crimes and misdemeanors. Potato potahto,
right?
Maybe Swalwell studied at the Humpty Dumpty School of Law,
whose founder famously said: “When I use a word … it means just what I choose
it to mean — neither more nor less.” I suppose “abuse of power” means exactly
the same as high crimes and misdemeanors to him.
He's not alone. Shirley Jackson Lee said abuse of power was
even a bigger crime against the Constitution. Mainly because Trump sought to
violate the sanctity of our elections – the cornerstone of our democracy – by
soliciting foreign interference from Ukraine, a country she famously couldn't find on a map,
I’d might take that seriously if the Democrats weren’t the same party that hired and paid a former foreign agent to get dirt from Russians to help
Hillary in the 2016 election. And if
these weren’t the same blowhards who always oppose voter ID and steps to ensure
that non-citizens aren’t allowed to vote.
That’s chutzpah. But you haver to admit it’s funny.
Just as the back and forth over Trump saying “us” instead of
“me” on the call. Democrats think he may have said “us” but what he really meant was “me.” They even had someone testify it was clear
Trump was using the “royal we.” Except he didn’t, which is particularly clear
when you see the context where he keeps referring to our country and our people
when he says “we.”
Again, from the party of Bill Clinton who said: “it depends
on what your meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” Prevaricate much?
There have been two primetime Democrat stars emerging from
this crapfest.
Schiff – that pencil-neck geek – has demonstrably lied for
years about everything, from claiming he had hard evidence Trump colluded with
the Russians until that was disproven by the Mueller Report, to most recently
lying about his staff meeting with the alleged whistleblower.
Or knowing who the whistleblower is. Or about steering the whistleblower to
attorneys who paid people for damaging dirt on Trump.
And after the actual transcript of the call was released,
showing how flawed and inaccurate the whistleblower’s account was, Schiff never
flinched. He has the balls to still say
the evidence of Trump’s wrongdoing on the Ukraine call is uncontested.
He points to all of his witnesses as proof.
Honestly, has he not been in his own hearings? Not one witness testified Trump did anything
illegal or even outside his Constitutional authority. Not one said they had
evidence he held up aid to Ukraine – or a meeting at the White House – to get
investigations by Ukraine.
Does he think the Republicans in those hearings – who
essentially shredded the testimony of every one of his witnesses, and proved
that not a single one them had any real evidence that Trump did anything more
than hurt their feelings – agree with him?
Uncontested, my ass.
Then, for additional comic relief, there’s Nadler, the Umpa
Lumpa of the Judiciary Committee, who fell asleep during one of his hearings
and routinely forgets his own Committee’s rules. Nadler’s the poster child for why there need
to be term limits.
My favorite moment in the whole impeachment fiasco, however,
was when he, along with Schiff and Pelosi, explained their rush and need to
impeach Trump to prevent him from stealing another election with foreign
interference.
Like that actually happened in 2016? Really?
Mueller Report, anyone? And Ukraine could tip the scales for Trump in
2020 all by itself by investigating Biden?
I would be remiss if I didn’t give an dishonorable mention to
two other Democrat loons – the Neanderthal Al Green and that other nitwit Karen
Bass – who said that if Trump somehow gets re-elected they’re open to
impeaching him again and again.
I guess nobody told Green and Bass that’s only possible if
they hold the House after 2020. Which, by the way, isn’t all that certain after
this impeachment clown show exposed what irresponsible disingenuous bozos House Democrats are.
Which is why, selfishly, I want the Democrats to keep the
hearings going.
Keep it up. I’m enjoying the show. Keep shooting
yourselves in the foot.
No comments:
Post a Comment