Intro

It's time for a reality check ...

Maybe we’ve reached the point of diminishing astonishment.

But I suspect that much of what we’re hammered with every day really doesn’t make much of an impact on most of us anymore. We’ve heard the same stories too often. We’ve been exposed to the same issues for so long without any meaningful resolution. We recognize that reality is rapidly becoming malleable, primarily in the hands of whoever has the biggest microphone. How else can we explain a society where myth asserts itself as reality, based entirely how many hits it gets online?

We know that many of the “issues” as defined are pure crapola, hyped by politicians on both sides pandering to “the will of the people,” which is still more crapola. Inevitably, it’s not the will of all the people they reflect, but the will of relatively small groups of people with disproportionate political influence.

Nobody wants to face up to the realities of the issues. Nobody wants to say what’s right or wrong – even when it’s obvious and there are numbers to back it up. Most of us are afraid to bring up the realities for fear of being accused of being insensitive or downright mean.

So we say nothing. Until now.

It’s time for a reality check on the fundamentals – much of which is common knowledge to many of us, already. But it might be comforting to know you are not alone …

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

Here in Florida – as elsewhere – it’s all about Trump …


I can’t think of another time when one person has so dominated everything. 

Everything is about, or somehow related to, Trump.

At least that’s how it feels. 

What’s he said, what’s he done, what’s he thinking, what might he do … it never ends. 

Turn on the TV and there’s always somebody opining on Trump, someone once on his staff or campaign, someone on his current staff, someone he likes, someone he despises, someone in his family, some place he is, someplace he’s going to be, something he’s tweeted, something he should have said, or whatever.  If there’s a way to bring Trump into a discussion, it will happen.

We’re entering primary season here in Florida and once again Trump seems to be the most important thing. Republicans fight over who is really a Trump supporter and who isn’t, regardless of which office they’re running for. They accuse each other of falsely claiming support for Trump because their opponent voted against things Trump wants, or once was a “card-carrying” Democrat. They all promise to support Trump’s agenda should they be elected.

For the Republican gubernatorial nomination Ron DeSantis has been endorsed by Trump. Many of DeSantis’ early ads focused on that exclusively, including one that closed by saying he was “endorsed by the big man himself.” But DeSantis’ opponent – Adam Putnam, current Commissioner of Agriculture – has been endorsed by Pam Bondi, current Florida Attorney General, who did an ad saying she worked hard to get Trump elected and supports Adam Putnam for governor. 

Putnam and DeSantis both claim fealty to Trump. Both claim they will work hard to support his policies on immigration, deporting illegal alien criminals, and opposing sanctuary cities.  I’m not sure what that actually means to most of my fellow Floridians, since state governors don’t have much authority over any of these.  But it sounds tough; I guess that’s what they’re going for. 

Democrats running in our primaries blame Trump for everything and invoke Schindler’s List-style images, and even references to the Holocaust, to portray him as the personification of evil.  They all promise to stop Trump, or at least stand up to him. 

Again, I’m not sure how that would work, since Florida’s governor won’t have any authority to do that – the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution means Federal law always trumps state law. 

But that’s not stopped the Democrat gubernatorial candidates from telling everyone how much tougher they’d be than their opponents in supporting abortion rights, Planned Parenthood, amnesty for DACA recipients, and of course, gun control. The usual talking points. 

One male candidate has even brought back the war-on-women theme saying he needs to be elected “for the women.” He’s also said he will stop the state from paying millions (for additional security?) every time Trump comes to his Florida resort.  Pretty much every one of his own campaign ads talks about how he will stand up to Trump.   It’s Trump this, Trump that, to the point even the left-leaning Palm Beach Post mocked him for it.

Unfortunately for him, his opponents have old video of him talking about Trump as a “great guy” and how much he likes Trump. And that’s running. 

Again, it’s Trump, Trump, Trump.   

The real action is yet to come.  That’s the battle for the next Senator from Florida between Republican Rick Scott, current governor of Florida, and Democrat Bill Nelson, current U.S. Senator from Florida.  Both will win their primaries hands-down so they’ll face off in the general.

Scott’s done a pretty good job as governor by all accounts.  But there’s more.  He’s said he will support legislation to set term limits in Congress – something I haven’t heard from any politician in ages. That’s a breathtaking move in my book. He’s also in favor of making Congress work year-round, five days a week, 12 months a year; another bold move. And if Congress allows the government to shut down, they shouldn’t get paid, according to Scott.  His campaign theme is: “Let’s get to work.”

Bill Nelson has been in office since the 70s. Before then he was an astronaut.  As far as anyone can tell, including leading newspapers in the state, he’s not really accomplished much of anything since then. The best that could be said about him is that he’s voted reliably with the Democrats for decades and never rocked the boat.  Nor introduced anything of note, apparently. 

He looks old, he sounds old, and is the epitome of a career politician.  To say he’s fighting for his political life is an understatement, given the public mood about career politicians.

Scott’s campaign theme, "let's get to work," is a direct attack on career politicians in general, and a less-than-subtle dig at Nelson.  

To counter Scott, Nelson’s campaign has focused on Scott’s refusal to accept Federal funding to expand Medicaid and CHIP under the Affordable Care Act. Nelson knows full well why Scott did that, as did many other Republican governors.

The Federal money came with big strings: after a few years Federal subsidies would stop and the state would have to pick up the full cost of expanding coverage to millions. However, the way Nelson’s supporters are portraying it, Scott decided to refuse the money which would have helped millions of low-income families and instead passed tax cuts in Florida to reward corporations and his rich friends, "just like him" one ad states.    

Scott has a bunch of pretty radical ideas to shake up the status quo in DC, as I’ve said. Nelson claims he’s helped Floridians by protecting Social Security, without a lot of details how he did that.

To me, Scott has ideas; Nelson doesn’t.  And I like Scott’s ideas. 

Right now Scott is leading Nelson in the most recent polls. He’s doing that without playing the Trump card too much, which is smart in a state like this.  Scott’s got Florida’s booming economy to run on, and he deserves some credit for that. 

It’s Scott’s to lose if things hold up. 

However, if this continues I expect Nelson to make a desperate move to jump the shark tank.  And how will he do that?

Just a guess, but I suspect it will involve something to do with Trump. 

It’s always all about Trump.     


No comments:

Post a Comment