Intro

It's time for a reality check ...

Maybe we’ve reached the point of diminishing astonishment.

But I suspect that much of what we’re hammered with every day really doesn’t make much of an impact on most of us anymore. We’ve heard the same stories too often. We’ve been exposed to the same issues for so long without any meaningful resolution. We recognize that reality is rapidly becoming malleable, primarily in the hands of whoever has the biggest microphone. How else can we explain a society where myth asserts itself as reality, based entirely how many hits it gets online?

We know that many of the “issues” as defined are pure crapola, hyped by politicians on both sides pandering to “the will of the people,” which is still more crapola. Inevitably, it’s not the will of all the people they reflect, but the will of relatively small groups of people with disproportionate political influence.

Nobody wants to face up to the realities of the issues. Nobody wants to say what’s right or wrong – even when it’s obvious and there are numbers to back it up. Most of us are afraid to bring up the realities for fear of being accused of being insensitive or downright mean.

So we say nothing. Until now.

It’s time for a reality check on the fundamentals – much of which is common knowledge to many of us, already. But it might be comforting to know you are not alone …

Thursday, February 27, 2014

The coming revolution ...

I keep wondering when the public is going to wake up and realize what’s happening.

I’m starting to believe it either won’t, or it has and doesn’t care.   It’s possible we just haven’t reached a tipping point yet, and when we do all Hell is going to break loose.     

I think we’re hurtling toward a cliff.  In fact, I believe we are accelerating toward it now.  Every day we get closer to the abyss.  Or to a revolution. 

There is a point when the elasticity goes out of a population.  There ceases to be a flexibility to roll with the punches, to turn the other cheek, to absorb and not retaliate in kind. 

It happens most often when predictability and stability are in flux.  That’s because people prefer predictability and stability; the alternative is chaos and chaos always makes people uneasy. 

When institutions start acting unpredictably they are like the canary in the coal mine; anxiety rises that chaos is imminent.  If government starts acting erratically, anxiety goes up.  When banks can no longer be trusted to keep your money safe, anxiety goes up.  When government starts being seen more as a corrupter than a protector of values, anxiety goes up.  

When established norms – like enforcement of laws, punishment of lawbreakers, protection of civil liberties, and the right to free speech – are no longer the norm, anxiety also goes up. 

In short, anxiety goes up whenever the foundations upon which we build our daily lives – and are at the heart of our core belief systems – are shaken.  People often don’t recognize it for what it is.  They have a feeling that something’s wrong, something’s out of balance, but they can’t put their finger on precisely what it is often because it’s so many things. 

Little things start to add up.  Then the hits keep on coming. 

When there’s enough anxiety among enough people, they will attack the source of chaos in an effort to restore normalcy.  Because that’s what most people really want – they want consistency and predictability; in other words “normalcy.”  They can get used to some changes over time, but not sudden shifts in the tectonic plates of their reality.

That’s where we are now.  A large part of society wants to overturn what are essentially bedrock American values. 

Like self-reliance.  The work ethic.  The value of a good education.  The dignity of supporting yourself and your family.  Being responsible.  Leading the free world.  Maintaining peace through strength.    

And being a nation where the rule of law is more important than the rule of man. 

America is still the land of opportunity, which is why so many other people in the world want to come here.  Those immigrants – legal or otherwise – still believe in the American Dream:  if you work hard, you can succeed. 

Too bad so many citizens here no longer believe that.  Too bad so many of them want to destroy our basic values to make themselves feel better. 

Maybe they want to lessen their guilt for failing to take advantage of the opportunities this great nation has always provided.  I suppose it’s easier for them to change the rules and blame others instead of sucking it up for their own lack of ambition to change their lot in life.    

The bigger problem is that so many of them now no longer believe in democracy, maintaining the balance of power in our government, and protecting our basic rights to free speech, assembly, and to worship how and where we please. 

Many Americans clearly prefer a simpler authoritarian style of government.  Which is great, as long as whoever is leading that government is doing what you want. 

When an authoritarian government ceases to do what you want and starts doing things you don’t want, then it’s not so great. 

In fact, you start thinking of it in different terms.  Like oppressive.  Dictatorial.  Tyrannical. 

So you see, it’s often a matter of perspective.  Right now, a lot of Americans are all in on the power grabs by the Democrats and Obama; they don’t see anything wrong with it.  To them, it’s a way to get what they want without the bother of following the Constitution or established law. 

Which is all fine and good – for them, for now.  But if a Republican as far right as Obama is far left – say Rick Santorum – gained the same power and started using it just as cavalierly, they’d be outraged. 

Let’s say Santorum decided to make prayer in school mandatory.  Suppose he decided to start channeling big chunks of Federal money to the Catholic Church, and decided his DOJ should instruct state Attorneys General to no longer prosecute pedophile priests.  What if he decided to use an Executive Order to wipe out health insurance for everybody but Roman Catholics? What if he pushed through appointments to the Federal bench of only conservative Catholic men who shared his views on contraception, abortion and the role of women?

Some people – especially Catholic conservatives – would cheer him on.  Others would be horrified.  But really, what’s the fundamental difference between all that and what Obama has done?   Not much.   

It’s abuse of power.  It’s just a question of who is abusing it. 

There’s a reason why the founders insisted on a balance of power among three equal branches of government.  Specifically, it was to prevent this from happening. 

Right now Obama and Democrats are tipping the scales too hard.  Public anxiety is rising. 

ObamaCare alone would be enough to have many wondering what the Hell is going on.  We’ve lost our leadership of the free world and now have to look to Russia to solve diplomatic problems.  Our enemies no longer fear us, and yet the Administration is opening promoting scaling back our military to pre-WWII levels.  AG Holder did instruct state Attorneys General recently that they didn’t have to enforce laws they didn’t agree with.  VP Biden was  quoted recently as saying how great it is that single mothers can quit their jobs to spend more time with their kids because they don’t have to rely on a job anymore to get healthcare.

WTF. 

It’s getting too crazy.  And irrational.  And that’s the breeding ground for revolution. 


Thursday, February 6, 2014

The 47% solution

Mitt Romney got hammered in the press when he said – in a secretly recorded speech – that 47% of the public wouldn’t vote for him because they were dependent on government benefits.

Democrats went wild.  They accused him of being a heartless monster.  How dare he attack people who – through no fault of their own – needed government benefits to simply survive? 

Democrats kept saying how callous and uncaring he must be to think that the 47% wanted to be dependent on government assistance.

Why, everybody knew the 47% would much rather be working full-time jobs and earning their own way.  But for one reason of another – age, infirmity, bad luck, whatever – they just can’t.  They needed government assistance.  To deny it would be cruel. 

To support this, the media trotted out a carefully selected portrait of the 47%.  They showed veterans. The homeless.  Grandma and Grandpa.  Children in single-parent households.  The unemployed.  And of course the disabled and their caretakers.    

Oh the humanity … And oh, what bullshit. 

Mitt was correct.  His only error was getting caught speaking the absolute truth. 

Certainly there are people getting government benefits who truly need them, or have honestly earned them.  Certainly there are also people using those benefits as a temporary measure until they get back on their feet.  And certainly there are some who would rather be working.

But it’s also apparent that a significant portion of able-bodied, working age adults getting those benefits simply don’t want to work.  Or work harder to get ahead.  And they don’t have to. 

They are perfectly content to use government money instead of their own to fund their lifestyle, feed their kids, pay their smartphone bills, and subsidize their trips to the grocery store.  Why wouldn’t they?  If they work it right, they can get the equivalent of a $40k to $60k annual income without ever leaving their couch.    

And now, free or heavily subsidized healthcare.   Why work at all? 

They’ve done the math.  The government’s pushed them in that direction as well.  It’s promoted the idea of Uncle Sam helping pay for all kinds of things.  So you can’t blame them for taking free money when it’s being pushed at them. 

The CBO just released a report that the way the Affordable Care Act is written it actually will encourage some workers to quit their full-time jobs and take lower-paying part-time gigs to get more generous subsidies.  We might lose the equivalent of 2.5 million full-time jobs over time as a result.     

Some seem surprised at this.  I’m not.  Democrats aren’t either.  In fact, some of them have been promoting this as another example of the ACA’s “liberating” effect on the working public.  They have gone as far as to state that this is a very good thing because it opens new “options” for workers to have more free time to spend with their families.   

The truth about the ACA, or ObamaCare, is that Democrats created it by design as a Trojan Horse.  The purpose of the ACA was really never solely to insure the uninsured as claimed. 

It was to fulfill a number of liberal Democrat ideals. 

One of those – never stated, but clearly implied by various policies – is apparently to diminish the importance of a work ethic. 

I guess that’s to improve the self-image of all those people who could work but don’t want to.  We don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings, do we?   That’s why we created the EBT card system, isn’t it?  The EBT card looks and functions just like a credit or debit card. Isn’t that thoughtful? 

There used to be a certain dignity to having a paying job of any kind and earning your own way.  Kids cut lawns, delivered papers, shoveled snow, babysat or ran a lemonade stand because the money they earned was their own.  And kids were proud of that.  Most young adults were thrilled when they got their first “real” full-time job, despite the lousy pay and often crappy hours. 

Work wasn’t always fun, but working was always a good thing. Most everyone agreed.   

Somewhere along the way, liberal Democrats changed their perspective on work.  They flipped the concept, for some unknown reason, to say that while there’s nothing wrong with working, there’s also nothing wrong with not working. 

Not working became acceptable in their view.  This went hand in hand with rewarding people for doing nothing.  Or working less.  Only now, the rewards get better and better all the time. 

Some months ago I reported the tale of the guy who turned down a promotion and raise because earning more would mean a cut in the childcare subsidies he was getting.  The tsk-tsk of the article I was quoting from was how unfair it was that he couldn’t keep the extra pay AND the generous subsidies at the same time. He had to give up one to keep the other.  He chose the subsidies. 

A lot of people have figured this out.  The message the government is sending out is if you really don’t feel like working, you don’t have to.  If you don’t feel like working that hard, we’ll support you in that, too.  Want to lope along in a part-time job so you have more time to hang out with your pals, that’s cool.  We’ll make sure you don’t starve.  And if you get sick, we’ll take care of you. 

What a country.  What a future. 

So is anyone really surprised that the CBO found that the ACA will help slackers everywhere to have more “freedom” and “options” about how much they want to work?  The less they work, the less they make, the higher the subsidy they get.  If they don’t work at all it’s essentially free. 

If we keep going this way the 47% will soon be in the majority.


Maybe that’s the goal:  to get people to vote for a living instead of working for a living.