Intro

It's time for a reality check ...

Maybe we’ve reached the point of diminishing astonishment.

But I suspect that much of what we’re hammered with every day really doesn’t make much of an impact on most of us anymore. We’ve heard the same stories too often. We’ve been exposed to the same issues for so long without any meaningful resolution. We recognize that reality is rapidly becoming malleable, primarily in the hands of whoever has the biggest microphone. How else can we explain a society where myth asserts itself as reality, based entirely how many hits it gets online?

We know that many of the “issues” as defined are pure crapola, hyped by politicians on both sides pandering to “the will of the people,” which is still more crapola. Inevitably, it’s not the will of all the people they reflect, but the will of relatively small groups of people with disproportionate political influence.

Nobody wants to face up to the realities of the issues. Nobody wants to say what’s right or wrong – even when it’s obvious and there are numbers to back it up. Most of us are afraid to bring up the realities for fear of being accused of being insensitive or downright mean.

So we say nothing. Until now.

It’s time for a reality check on the fundamentals – much of which is common knowledge to many of us, already. But it might be comforting to know you are not alone …

Wednesday, July 11, 2012


Words have specific meanings – and some are trying to change those

Not to be overly pedantic, but most words have very specific meanings.  A dog is a dog.  A cat is a cat.  An ice-cream sundae is an ice-cream sundae, for example. 

We all understand those words and agree on what they mean.  They aren’t nuanced at all. 

However, there’s a disturbing move by some to change the meanings of perfectly acceptable words to suit their agenda.  Or eliminate words altogether.  It’s almost Orwellian; it smacks of newspeak.

Artificially changing the long-established meanings of certain words – to be more inclusive, less “hurtful,” or to twist the meaning to imply the opposite – is intellectually dishonest. 

It’s an affront to the language.  It’s also a crass attempt to avoid dealing the implications of what that word truly stands for.  It’s political correctness running roughshod over reality. 

Take the word “illegal,” as one example.   

Someone who doesn’t follow the normal legal processes for entering this country is here illegally.   They are an illegal alien, or at the least an illegal immigrant.  They are not an “undocumented worker” – which implies they merely lost their paperwork.  They are not simply an “immigrant” – because that includes those who come here legally as well as illegally.

Yet there’s a campaign to stop the use of this perfectly descriptive and accurate word.  Supporters believe it’s hurtful to those who apparently left their papers at home, forgot that their visa expired, or were in too much of a rush to follow immigration policies.  

Yes, they are technically here against the law, but so what?  What's the big deal?  It's just a technicality, in their view.  

Illegal is such a mean word, according to the campaign, and so antithetical to what America stands for, we should all stop using it.  Get rid of this “I” word altogether. 

They prefer “undocumented.”  After all, they say:  “No human being is illegal.”

Got news for you.  If you are a  non-citizen living here in violation of our immigration laws – and it doesn’t make a damn bit of difference how or why you came here, if you pay taxes, or how long you’ve lived here  – you’re here illegally.  There’s no way to nuance that. 

So get used to the real word “illegal.”  That’s what it is.  Sorry if it hurts somebody’s feelings.  If they don’t like it, they can always go back to where they came from and start over. 

Only this time, do it the right way; the way legal immigrants have for years.    

Then we’ll welcome them with open arms. 

Until then, they need to accept reality.  If they get caught being here illegally, they’re liable to be deported.  Again, sorry, but those are the rules in most cases.

Unless you’re the Kenyan aunt of the President, of course.    

All the marches, clever videos, and boo-hoo stories in the New York Times and elsewhere won’t change the fact that “illegal” means exactly what it means in the U.S.

At least for now.       

No comments:

Post a Comment