Intro

It's time for a reality check ...

Maybe we’ve reached the point of diminishing astonishment.

But I suspect that much of what we’re hammered with every day really doesn’t make much of an impact on most of us anymore. We’ve heard the same stories too often. We’ve been exposed to the same issues for so long without any meaningful resolution. We recognize that reality is rapidly becoming malleable, primarily in the hands of whoever has the biggest microphone. How else can we explain a society where myth asserts itself as reality, based entirely how many hits it gets online?

We know that many of the “issues” as defined are pure crapola, hyped by politicians on both sides pandering to “the will of the people,” which is still more crapola. Inevitably, it’s not the will of all the people they reflect, but the will of relatively small groups of people with disproportionate political influence.

Nobody wants to face up to the realities of the issues. Nobody wants to say what’s right or wrong – even when it’s obvious and there are numbers to back it up. Most of us are afraid to bring up the realities for fear of being accused of being insensitive or downright mean.

So we say nothing. Until now.

It’s time for a reality check on the fundamentals – much of which is common knowledge to many of us, already. But it might be comforting to know you are not alone …

Tuesday, April 3, 2012


“What’s going on in Florida?” (RE: Trayvon Martin …) Part II …

Maybe Zimmerman really did just shoot down Trayvon Martin because Trayvon was in the wrong place at the wrong time, which would be inexcusable, and for which Zimmerman should be charged with murder or at least manslaughter. 

Or maybe it happened the way Zimmerman says it did and he was just defending himself and got beat up in the process. 

Some videos seem to support Zimmerman’s claim; others make his injuries appear far less serious.   Audio of the cries for help points – according to a couple of experts – to Martin as the source, not Zimmerman.   There are conflicting eyewitness reports.  

At this point, the only people who really know for certain – because they were there – are Martin and Zimmerman.  Martin is dead, and Zimmerman has his account, so now it’s up to the forensics people. 

In the meantime, the circus continues. 

From the beginning, too much of the coverage of this event has been about stereotyping – the poor black kid shot merely for being in a largely “white” gated community at night while wearing a hoodie.

The hoodie has become a symbol of support for the Martin family’s claims, with the subtext that you can’t judge someone’s intent simply by the clothes they wear.  Even the POTUS weighed on this, when he said that if he had a son he would look like Trayvon. 

Apparently, just because someone dresses like the people you always see in security footage of convenience store robberies, you have no rational reason to be at least a little suspicious. 

From now on you’re not supposed to infer that that some guy behind you at the ATM at midnight wearing a hoodie pulled down to hide his face might be up to no good, for example.  Go ahead and pull out a bunch of cash.  Everything’s good.  Nothing to worry about.

Come on.  If you see someone with a shaved head and swastika tats you’re going to quickly infer that the person is a skinhead, and probably a Jew- and black-hating racist.  Right or wrong, that’s what you’re going to think – the probability that the same person is a mild-mannered, Prius-driving florist who belongs to the local synagogue is pretty slim. 

Now people have the right to wear whatever they want.  They can also decorate their bodies any way they like.  It’s a free country.  And someone’s appearance is certainly no excuse to shoot them.   

But it’s unrealistic to think that how someone appears doesn’t leave you with an impression about them.  If you intentionally send off visual vibes that you’re a gangsta or gangsta wannabe – regardless of whether you think it’s nothing more than a fashion statement – you can’t expect others to know your motives.  You look like a gangsta, you’ll be perceived as a gangsta, and people will react accordingly. 

Which leads to the use of pictures in this case. 

The media has gone out of its way to paint Martin as this skinny, likable young man by using the smiling pictures of him in his high-school football uniform, with his family, and what seems to be his class picture from junior high.  Zimmerman’s most-used picture, on the other hand, shows him scowling in what appears to be a police mug shot taken years ago when he was heavier.    

Neither accurately portrays Martin nor Zimmerman the way they were at the time of the shooting.

In reality, Martin was not some skinny kid; he was about 6’3” tall and about 200 lbs – a rather formidable young man at 17.  Zimmerman is 28 years old, not a big guy, and not a racist by any accounts according to his neighbors; in fact he is the product of a mixed marriage of a white father and a Hispanic mother.  There are pictures surfacing now that show Zimmerman as a smiling, affable kind of person. 

Now more recent pictures are also emerging of Martin that show him with a lot of tats, gold veneers on his teeth,  and others of him wearing a hoodie and a gangsta expression. 

The media hasn’t shown those much because that might water down the persona of Martin they and Martin’s family – which BTW is moving to trademark his image and “I am Trayvon” as well as “Justice for Trayvon” – have been carefully cultivating. 

Go figure. 

The tragedy in all this is that a 17-year-old guy was shot and killed.  Which is sad. 

That so many people continue to try to take advantage of this to further their own personal and political agendas makes it sadder still. 

Eventually we may learn what really happened that night.  We can only hope. 

In the meantime, everyone needs to back down the rhetoric, the accusations and the manufactured outrage and marches so the investigators can do their jobs.

No comments:

Post a Comment