Intro

It's time for a reality check ...

Maybe we’ve reached the point of diminishing astonishment.

But I suspect that much of what we’re hammered with every day really doesn’t make much of an impact on most of us anymore. We’ve heard the same stories too often. We’ve been exposed to the same issues for so long without any meaningful resolution. We recognize that reality is rapidly becoming malleable, primarily in the hands of whoever has the biggest microphone. How else can we explain a society where myth asserts itself as reality, based entirely how many hits it gets online?

We know that many of the “issues” as defined are pure crapola, hyped by politicians on both sides pandering to “the will of the people,” which is still more crapola. Inevitably, it’s not the will of all the people they reflect, but the will of relatively small groups of people with disproportionate political influence.

Nobody wants to face up to the realities of the issues. Nobody wants to say what’s right or wrong – even when it’s obvious and there are numbers to back it up. Most of us are afraid to bring up the realities for fear of being accused of being insensitive or downright mean.

So we say nothing. Until now.

It’s time for a reality check on the fundamentals – much of which is common knowledge to many of us, already. But it might be comforting to know you are not alone …

Friday, March 28, 2014

We the Sheeple

At first I thought we were just becoming dumber as a nation. 

I couldn’t understand how so many ordinary Americans simply couldn’t comprehend simple math. 

Simple stuff like:  If Jimmy has two apples and gives one apple each to Sally and Jill, how many apples does Jimmy have left?  Or to put it in a more relevant perspective:  if the Federal government takes in $2 trillion a year in taxes and fees, and spends $3 trillion a year, how much money does the Federal government have left to spend on other things? 

This type of stuff seemed to baffle a lot of people. 

They also seemed unable to separate something clearly false from reality. 

When Obama said in 2009: “no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what. ” – that seemed to me to be pretty straightforward.   Practically a guarantee. 

Yet when millions lost their doctors and their plans because of Obama’s signature legislative achievement, it was as if he’d never said that. In fact, Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, said that people who claimed they lost their doctors and their plans because of ObamaCare were liars. 

And a large part of the public shrugged and said, well, okay.   

When the government briefly shut down and idled 800,000 non-essential government workers, the public was outraged.  But when 5 million or more people lost their healthcare insurance they were promised they could keep, crickets.  Probably that old math problem again …

Then I had an epiphany. 

It wasn’t that the nation was becoming dumber. 

A lot of Americans just didn’t care anymore.  About anything. 

Economics.  Politics.  National defense.  Foreign affairs (unless these involved Bill Clinton or celebrities).   The national debt.  Education.  Healthcare.  Taxes.  Farm subsidies.  The growth of entitlements.  Holding politicians and government officials accountable.  The IRS investigation. 

You know, all the things Republicans and Fox News keep bringing up? 

Americans didn’t give a rat’s patoot about any of this stuff.  They couldn’t care less.

It’s clear to me now that a growing number are only concerned about what affects them personally, right now.  Stuff that happens to other people, and stuff that could happen in the future doesn’t interest them at all. 

If it doesn’t impact them now, they don’t care. 

This also means they don’t care what anybody else does, unless they get affected directly, and immediately, as a result. 

In the abstract this seems like a virtue.  Live and let live.  Don’t be judgmental.  Don’t try to tell others what they should or shouldn’t do.  If it’s not doing you any harm, what business is it of yours what others do? 

In reality, however, it’s become an easy excuse to justify indifference and ignorance. 

If people claim not to care what anyone else does, what the government does, what the laws are, or what’s happening in the world around them, it’s not a case of live and let live. They’re simply hoping things they can’t be bothered to understand will take care of themselves. 

That rarely works out well. History has proven that time and again. 

Still, a large number of Americans are apparently happy to ignore the world around them; their assumption is that someone else is already taking care of the important stuff so they don’t have to. They can’t see wasting their time trying to figure out if whoever’s running things is really up to the task at hand, or just screwing things up.  Life goes on, regardless. 

Besides, if anything was really that important, they’d hear about it on social media or someone would interrupt their favorite TV or cable show with an announcement.  Otherwise, who cares? 

Consequently, they are blissfully ignorant about current events here and abroad. They don’t bother reading a newspaper, watching the news on TV, or listening to newsbreaks on radio.  In fact, they aggressively avoid exposure to news.  News is just background noise getting in the way of something they really want like movies, music or other entertainment.  So most don’t know what’s happening in their own city or state, much less what’s happening elsewhere.  

And they don’t care.   They truly believe that what you don’t know can’t hurt you.

Now, there’s a great temptation to think this is largely a trait of the young – like adolescents, teenagers and the 20-somethings.  It’s not.  Talk to young adults in their mid to late 30s. Talk to people in their 40s and 50s, too.  Go ahead.  I dare you. Ask them about almost any current event – you’ll be stunned by how little they know. 

You’ll be even more stunned to find out how little they care.  At the same time, they’ll be stunned you even bothered to ask.

Lack of knowledge you could almost understand.  Many folks tune out under the weight of information overload. 

But lack of caring?  That’s harder to accept. 

If Americans don’t care about what their government is doing, how the government is spending their money, what laws will or won’t be enforced, and what threats lurk in the outside world, this opens the door to an autocracy that will take their indifference for consent. 

Sort of the situation we find ourselves in now. 

And American democracy will go out not with a bang, but a “whatever.”


Friday, March 14, 2014

The real two-party system ...

The real two-party system today has nothing to do with party affiliation.   It’s now the de facto ruling class versus the working class.

Who makes up the ruling class?  Start with establishment types like Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Lindsey Graham and John McCain from the Republicans.  On the Democrat’s side you have Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin among others. 

In short, members of the ruling class include the deal makers in government willing to put their own and their supporters’ interests ahead of what’s best for the country as a whole.

Add the legions of government employees and their unions, politically appointed regulators, government contractors and suppliers, as well as the entire lobbying industry that relies on currying favor with the government for sustenance.  Then throw in businesses and industries that wouldn’t exist – or be nearly as profitable – without government support. 

Now you have a fairly complete 50,000 foot view of the greatest domestic threat the American public has ever faced in modern times …

The political establishment. 

The members may not always work in concert, but their goals are the same:  To enrich themselves and their friends at the government trough.   

The political establishment is essentially lawless, unless you consider the law of the jungle – in this case survival of the most politically connected.  Its legislative members routinely exempt themselves and their allies from laws and regulations they’ve initiated yet don’t care to follow, while enforcing those on the rest of us.

They see nothing wrong with carve outs for each other and their friends.  Until recently few Americans probably knew that the Republican and Democrat parties received a total of more than $36 million in government money in 2012 to help with the cost of their national conventions. 

This gift from taxpayers to the two major political parties only surfaced because Eric Cantor and others in the Senate pushed a bill to redirect that money toward pediatric cancer research. 

Guess where the $36 million originally came from?  You know that box on your tax returns to direct $3 of your tax to Presidential Campaign Financing – the box pushed by campaign finance reform advocates?  Your money was used to subsidize lavish events for Republicans and Democrats.  Nice.  

Do you still believe the political establishment doesn’t work in concert, across party lines? 

There are also apparently no penalties for its members for stealing on the job, padding contracts, investing based on insider information, breaking laws, misusing government resources, or other serious offenses that would land normal folks in prison for a long, long time.

Just remember the GSA scandal.  Also remember the guy who took the EPA for about $900,000 while falsely claiming he was also working for the CIA – over a period of almost a decade.  Now an audit of a small number of credit cards used by EPA employees showed that 75 of the 80 or so transactions reviewed had been misused for about $80,000 in personal charges, including for family gym memberships, child care and gift cards. 

And you can bet these are just the tip of the iceberg. 

Anybody who believes government employees are solely focused on serving the public is delusional; a large number are focused on serving themselves and their bosses at our expense. 

What makes the political establishment such a threat to our society is not the money they take from us and squander.  No, it’s the power they continue to accumulate, aided and abetted by a complicit media that refuses to do its job. 

With enough power the political establishment can do whatever it wants.  We’re seeing that now.  We’re so far in debt it’s almost beyond comprehension.  Yet the political establishment continues to borrow more and more so it can spend more and more on whatever it wishes.

The political establishment is already powerful, pervasive and pernicious.  It’s also seductive.  Because it controls how much money exists, who gets more or less of that money, where and how many jobs are created using that money, and how much it takes from each of us, it can use that power to bend others to its will. 

Because it controls which laws are created, and which laws are enforced and how, it has near tyrannical control over all of us.  It can use various branches and agencies of the government to harass, intimidate, and crush political adversaries with virtual impunity.  At the same time, it can turn a blind eye to criminal acts it chooses not to prosecute. 

It’s also one of the few solid growth areas in our economy.  While the rest of the country suffered mightily during the last recession, the political establishment prospered.  While ordinary businesses had to lay off workers, hiring was up for the political establishment.  It even managed to find money to buy parts of major industries, bail out banks and favored companies, and fund pet projects.

The traditional Republican Party wants you to believe none of that would have happened had they been in control.  That’s simply not true.  Establishment Republicans are just like establishment Democrats, united under the motto of “go along, to get along.”   

The truth is, when Republicans gain enough power they are no different than the current Democrats.  Republicans are just as likely to drive up the deficit while expanding the size and scope of the Federal government. 

Nixon gave us the EPA and OSHA, among others.  Reagan was the first U.S. President ever to boost the deficit over a trillion dollars in a single term, mainly through spending that largely benefitted defense contractors.  George W. Bush will be remembered for the costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but he also gave us the budget-busting prescription-drug coverage plan.  And George W. was a groundbreaker when it came to deciding what parts of what laws he planned to enforce through “signing statements.” 

In reality, the only actual differences between establishment Republicans and establishment Democrats are so minor as to be laughable. They are cut from the same cloth.  They believe in using government money to win friends, influence enemies, and further their careers.

Are there loftier motives at times?  Certainly.  The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a perfect example.  So is the Americans with Disabilities Act.  Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. 

More often than not, unfortunately, most pieces of “bipartisan” legislation are a witches’ brew of self-aggrandizing publicity, special interest payoffs, pork, and pet projects.  (Drill down on the details of the most recent “farm bill” and see for yourself.) 

So while establishment types in both parties want you to believe the parties are fundamentally different, they’re not.  Sure, on TV they appear to be at each other’s throats.  But behind the scenes they are back slapping and high-fiving as they cut deals and swap votes to help one another.

Republican and Democrat incumbents work together to protect each other from competitive races in their home districts.  They also join forces to limit any reforms that might make them more accountable, or to tighten ethics standards.  Republicans have no problem funding a pork project in a Democrat’s district in exchange for a pork project in their district. 

Most of all, they’ll form whatever unholy alliance is needed to keep the status quo intact; neither establishment Republicans nor Democrats want to change the way things work . The system may appear perverse and counterproductive to most rational observers, but the players understand how to work it for maximum gain. 

That’s why the Tea Party is so reviled by establishment types on both sides of the aisle, and the bĂȘte noir for government employees and contractors.  The Tea Party threatens the status quo.  They are outsiders not willing to play the game according to the establishment’s rules. 

Career politicians like Boehner and McConnell, and Reid and Pelosi – all of whom kissed ass for years to get where they are – are confounded by newbies to the club who don’t bow down to their elders. Worse, the Tea Party types are vocal and not content to vote the way they’re told.

Folks like Kelly Ayotte, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee are heretics to the political establishment.  They challenge the hierarchy.  They refuse to be “managed.” They say things that are true, but uncomfortable for party leaders to hear. 

They aren’t “team” players, in simplest terms.  And for that, they’ve been dismissed as Tea Party extremists or misguided even by members of their own party.      

Make no mistake, the idea of a Tea Party-style grassroots resistance to business as usual threatens a way of life for the entire political establishment, so there’s a bipartisan move to destroy it by whatever means necessary. The last thing the political establishment wants to deal with is millions of pissed off voters who might want to cut spending and rein in government expansion. 

Just listen to how Boehner, McCain and other establishment Republicans attack the Tea Party. It’s eerily similar to the talking points for the Democrats.  The media’s also doing a job on the Tea Party whenever they can.  TV and movie producers are doing their part as well.  

Lost in all this focus on the “vast right-wing conspiracy” of the Tea Party is a very simple truth:  the Tea Party isn’t even an organized party.  As far as I can tell, this loosely knit coalition has no positions on social issues.  It appears most Tea Party-type groups are generally focused on fiscal responsibility and stopping wasteful spending. 

Which, to me, seems like a good idea. 

I suppose that scares the crap out of the political establishment.  It must; otherwise, why would career politicians, public sector unions, the media, Hollywood and others unleash such vitriol on what truly started out to be a grassroots American movement? 

The Tea Party has been accused of racism, being anti-science, anti-progress bigots, homophobes and whatever else can be slung at them.  None of which has been proven. 

If anything, perhaps the most frightening thing of all for the political establishment is that most Tea Party supporters seem like perfectly normal middle-class Americans who don’t want to see their taxes go up anymore. 

How dare they. 

The only non-violent way to stop the political establishment is to overthrow them at the ballot box.  That requires putting up and supporting commonsense candidates who represent our interests, and not the interests of the establishment.  

That means taking a reasonable approach to spending, scaling back the domestic reach of government, reducing Federal payrolls, decertifying Federal public sector unions, ending no-bid Federal contracts, enforcing ethics laws, and staying the Hell out of social issues. 

It also means realistic means testing for benefits, strengthening the safety net for those who truly need it, and making national defense a priority. 

Oh, and upholding the Constitution.  

You know, the things that are important to us. 

It can be done.  It has been done in the past.  And we need to do it now. 


Monday, March 10, 2014

Daylight Saving Time ...

The “spring forward, fall back” nonsense always infuriates me. 

I’m a reasonably intelligent guy but I’ve yet to understand why we do this.  There’s absolutely no rational reason I’ve ever seen for setting our clocks back an hour in the fall, and then forward an hour in spring. 

Proponents claim it gives people more daylight hours.  They also claim it saves energy. 

What it really does is to compel folks in the afflicted time zones to run around and reset every clock, watch and device dependent on a clock twice a year. And for what?  So they can screw up their circadian rhythm for a few days? 

Honestly, there’s no point to this.  Some NY politician first brought up this idea for the U.S., which shouldn’t really surprise anyone. It was stupid when it started and remains stupid today. 

Hate to burst everybody’s bubble, but the number of daylight hours has nothing to do with setting your clocks forward or back.  There are always fewer hours of sunlight each day as we head into winter; then the number of hours of sunlight each day increases as we head out of winter.

There’s real science behind why that happens, but one thing’s for certain – changing your watches and clocks has nothing to do with it. 

So it’s always been a dumb idea.  But leave it to Congress to make it even dumber. 

It was bad enough when we all accepted when this futile illusion would begin and end.  Makers of electronic devices used this predictability to preprogram a wide range of devices so they would automatically change their displays for us.

Then, not long ago, actually with the Energy Policy Act of 2005, bureaucrats and politicians decided to change the start and stop dates. Why?  No idea.  I suspect nobody in Congress did either.  The net result was to start DST a little earlier and end it a bit later.  (It now starts the second Sunday of March, and ends the first Sunday of November – just for the record.)

So now DST is about 4-5 weeks longer than it used to be.  Woo-hoo.  Don’t you feel better knowing that your government can control the number of daylight hours there are, and has decided to give you more of them?  Well, where’s your gratitude? 

Of course all those devices preprogrammed with original start/stop dates now have to be manually set.  But that’s a small price to pay for more daylight hours, right? 

Now, if we ended this madness what would happen?  Would schoolchildren have to trick-or-treat in the dark again? Would energy consumption soar?  What about school kids waiting in the dark for their school bus?   

Will all Hell break loose?

Nope.  Just look at Arizona.  They’re not on DST.  And they seem to be doing quite nicely without it.  As we would.